A visit to the Ann Arbor Public Library coincided with a need for a lunch solution today, so I stopped in at Jerusaleum Garden for the first time in a while. They seem to have a new menu and are generally looking spiffy. I sat in the adjoining patio that they share with Earthen Jar (a vegetarian Indian restaurant that sells its food from steam tables by the pound). It was a perfect summer day, just hot enough to make welcome a languid moment watching passersby while surrounded by diners and potted flowers. I was also pleasantly impressed with lunch – for $15 we got a fully loaded lunch for two (leftovers will serve for a couple more days). The tabbouli had a number of chopped vegetables, including carrots, cucumbers, and tomatoes in it, along with the required parsley in good proportion, and a light lemon dressing. The falafel was not oily. The yogurt salad was generously loaded with chopped cucumbers. It was a perfect summer lunch in one of the places that gives Ann Arbor its special local character. I hope that it is not endangered.
Think Local First has a really fun T-shirt that I first saw Steve Bean modeling at a Transition Ann Arbor meeting. It says, “Keep Ann Arbor Funky”. (Sadly, they were on sale at Shaman Drum, another special piece of Ann Arbor that just closed.) I agree with the sentiment. What is it? “Funky” has gone through many meaning changes, including references to “funk” music. But “characterized by originality and modishness; unconventional” or more simply, as another source gives it, “hip“, is what we are looking for here, along with an acknowledgment of a slightly down-at-the-heel character, as in the computing definition, where “(funky) is said of something that functions, but in a slightly strange, klugey way. It does the job and would be difficult to change, so its obvious non-optimality is left alone”.
Many of our beloved institutions (I’m thinking of eating places, but there are others) are like this – not always bright and shiny, but real originals that bring character to the town in a way that the newest “concept” can’t. They are individual and irreplaceable, and they are being lost. We have lost Red Hot Lovers (though it may re-emerge in another location). We have lost Tios, though the restaurant has moved to McKinley’s Liberty Street complex. Happily, Blimpy’s lives.
I can hear the boos and jeers now. “Ann Arbor in Amber.” (Jon Zemke of Concentrate pulled off a classic with his “amber NIMBY neighborhoods”). Yet without anchors of its unique and personal character, Ann Arbor could be a moderately affluent suburb anywhere. The Ann Arbor Chronicle has been finding a number of posts from other communities (listed in their Old Media and New Media sections) where Ann Arbor is spoken of enviously. Being called a living museum may not sound complimentary, but the artificial communities sometimes called lifestyle centers try to emulate it. Other cities literally build theme parks trying to capture that sense of genuine character that we possess now. (I was amused to note that Hyde Park, the home of our current President, has Ann Arbor envy, though funkiness is not mentioned in the article.)
But can character stand up against the relentless press of development? Look again at the picture of Zaragon Place looming over the hapless shell of Red Hot Lovers. The property has evidently become too valuable. When the City Council begins to develop the Library Lot, will Earthen Jar and Jerusalem Garden survive? I hope so, else we will have lost a little bit of ourselves.
Recent Comments