AAATA and the Zen of the Millage Vote
Will they or won’t they? The tantalizing wait for a May millage decision.
The Ann Arbor Transportation Authority has been on a long journey. We began reporting in December 2009 on their efforts to put in place a county-wide transit authority. It’s been a long Ride. On November 8, 2012, the culmination of much planning, consulting, execution of legal documents, and public engagement collapsed when the Ann Arbor City Council voted to opt out from the nascent authority, in the face of the withdrawal by virtually every other jurisdiction in Washtenaw County. But the AATA got busy and assembled “urban core” communities for some serious talking.
The idea was to put together a smaller, tighter version of the countywide plan to serve only the relatively urbanized communities surrounding Ann Arbor. This matches the population profile of the county and makes sense, as mass transit does require some masses. They had some measure of success. They have now succeeded in expanding the authority to include the City of Ypsilanti and Ypsilanti Township. Other communities continue to be reserved about jumping in to a membership that includes being vulnerable to a future millage tax. Still, the newly christened Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority plans to include Pittsfield Township and perhaps the city of Saline and village of Dexter via longer-term POSA contracts.
With that in hand, the AAATA has been involved in a major public engagement campaign for the new, reconfigured 5-year plan. Our post Moving Us Forward: The Urban Core Expansion Plan explains that in some detail.
Now the AAATA has refined their plan, following public input. Tonight (January 16, 2014) the Board will be asked to approve the revised 5-year plan (formally the Five-Year Transit Improvement Program) “for implementation when local funding is secured”. The plan has a roughly $5.47 million funding gap. That is what is supposed to be filled by an authority-wide (Ann Arbor, City of Ypsilanti, and Ypsilanti Township) millage. There is also a fairly hefty expectation of additional POSA funds. (Click the figure for larger view.) Note that the expected millage amount is still 0.7 mills, as has been estimated for months.
Who moved my millage?
But what is missing from tonight’s agenda is an approval of a millage ballot measure. Partners for Transit, an organization formed originally to promote a countywide transit organization, today put out a public statement calling for AAATA to authorize a millage measure.
Partners for Transit, a coalition of business and community leaders, religious groups, social service organizations, and environmental organizations today called on the Ann Arbor Area Transportation Authority to propose a new millage to advance the AAATA’s five year plan for improving public transportation in Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, Ypsilanti Township, and the neighboring region.
The account on the Ann Arbor News mentions that “AAATA officials have been talking about putting a 0.7-mill tax on the ballot in May to fund the expanded services in Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and Ypsilanti Township”, and doubtless PFT assumed that this vote is on tonight’s agenda. But it isn’t. Further, there is no mention of this issue in the minutes of the Planning and Development Committee, where agenda items are usually discussed.
Now, this is very peculiar. We’ve been hearing for months about a likely May millage vote, and it is already being debated by the public. Indeed, I spoke at public comment to the PDC two months ago and urged them to go ahead and schedule the vote. But apparently, AAATA administration and Board are still weighing their options.
The May ballot made sense for an important reason: the property tax collection schedule. Local property taxes are collected in July. A millage on the May ballot would mean that money would start rolling in for an August implementation, and indeed schedules presented at the fall workshops seemed to factor in that expectation. A millage passed either at the August primary or the November general election would not be available until July 2015. This would put off implementation by a full year.
There was some urgency in getting the matter voted on by the AAATA Board. There are statutory deadlines for putting measures on the ballot. Two steps, first informing (by “petition”) the local clerks, then getting the final language to them for the ballot. Here are the deadlines for this year.
This was an error and the table has been replaced with one showing correct dates. The “petition” step does not apply to ballot measures placed by a governing board, but rather to petitions which require collection of signatures. In each case, the Board meeting for a month in which action is necessary does precede the deadline in that month.
Why the holdup? We can only speculate. There is always a strategy involved in getting a ballot measure passed. We don’t know what the fine details of all the surveys that they have been conducting. Has there been some uncertainty about public acceptance? Any tax issue is always controversial. But positive survey results are not necessarily a guarantee.
The later elections this year seem to be problematic for a couple of reasons. One is the possibility (probably remote) that the Southeast Michigan Regional Transit Authority might also place a transit millage on the ballot. This seems not very likely reading between the lines of the Detroit News report of the RTA’s recent meeting. They have had some setbacks, including a lack of support from the State Legislature and the loss of their selected candidate for CEO, John Hertel. But the Chair of the RTA board, Paul Hillegonds, is quoted as saying that they have enough funds to get along for a while (mostly just to pay staff, not to undertake any initiatives).
Even more troubling might be the chaotic nature of current Ann Arbor politics. With John Hieftje’s departure from his mayoral chair, the music has been getting downright frenetic, with four council members running for mayor and three new council candidates for vacated seats (partial summary here). The months of June and July are likely to be steamy regardless of the weather. The November election looks calmer in the city, but it is a gubernatorial election and there will be plenty of action at the polls for statewide seats. Based on the November election of 2012, Ann Arbor is likely to contribute about 64% of the voters to an AAATA-wide election. (The City of Ypsilanti is about 7%, Ypsilanti Township 28%.) So the political mood in Ann Arbor could be important to the AAATA. In addition, it is always the mix of voters for a particular election that matters. Is a bigger turnout more or less favorable? Typically there are many more voters, often less informed, in the November elections. For a millage vote, it might be better to try to turn out favorable voters in a smaller election.
A timely report on tonight’s (January) board meeting from the Ann Arbor Chronicle provides one possible reason for the delay; a May ballot will incur more costs (because they’d have to pay for the election) than later. With all the money spent to date, it seems it might have been worth it.
UPDATE: AAATA has already issued a press release regarding the Board’s approval of the plan. Here is what they say about a millage:
AAATA officials say they are considering a recommendation that calls for the TheRide Board to approve placing a 0.7-mill, five-year property tax increase proposal on the 2014 ballot for residents in Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and Ypsilanti Township. The date of a potential election is still to be determined pending the outcome of the AAATA Board’s decision.
SECOND UPDATE: In a follow-up article on Ann Arbor News AAATA Board Chair Charles Griffiths describes the potential benefits of the plan for “this year”, apparently without understanding that a deadline for the May ballot is about to pass without his board’s action.
THIRD UPDATE: I’ve been informed that I am misinterpreting the ballot deadlines. The petition deadline applies to measures for which signatures must be collected. (See corrections in the body of the text.) The relevant deadline for a May ballot is February 25, for ballot language. So it looks as though they can still make it. But why the delay in approving it?
FOURTH UPDATE: Here is a report from ModeShift of the latest RTA meeting in which there was discussion of both an RTA millage and possible conflicts with provider millages (including AAATA) .
FIFTH UPDATE: The Ann Arbor Chronicle has produced a comprehensive summary of the January 16 AAATA meeting, in head-spinning time.
SIXTH UPDATE: At their Planning and Development Committee meeting of February 11, 2014, AAATA board members sent forth a resolution to place a measure calling for an authority-wide millage of 0.7 mills on the May 2014 ballot. This is likely to sail through the February 20 board meeting without a hitch, in time to be submitted before the deadline.
This is a boon to Council and Mayoral candidates, who are now relieved from being asked questions about their position on this measure prior to the August primary.
SEVENTH UPDATE: As predicted, the AAATA board voted unanimously to place the millage on the May ballot, after some carefully staged political theater (many speakers were present to urge them on). Excellent coverage by the Ann Arbor Chronicle has the details.Explore posts in the same categories: Regional, Transportation